4 Reasons Why You Should Define Software Security Requirements for Mature Applications

4 Reasons Why You Should Define Software Security Requirements for Mature Applications

There’s a common misconception that security requirements are only useful for net new applications. Most people think once an application has been developed, it’s too late to introduce new security requirements. While you might realize maximum cost effectiveness by building security requirements in right from the start, the reality is that any application can benefit from software security requirements analysis. Here’s why:

  1. New vulnerabilities: Attackers are crafting new ways to break into systems all the time. Eventually, some of these will affect your application. Continuously checking for new security requirements means that you won’t leave your system at risk when the new vulnerabilities come up.
  2. Applications change: Every new feature or refactoring exercise can introduce new risks into the system, and simply using automated analysis tools or time-boxed manual penetration testing isn’t sufficient to capture the risks. Ongoing inclusion of security requirements means that every change to the system upholds the cybersecurity posture of the system rather than weakening it. Even if your application is relatively stable with very few changes, it just takes one newly introduced risk to expose the entire application to compromise.
  3. Risk assessment: Establishing accurate security requirements means assessing the risk of an application and coming up with corresponding countermeasures. This is similar to a risk assessment, which is usually a manual exercise. With automated requirements generation, you can scale the exercise of risk assessments to a large number of applications very quickly.
  4. Stress relief: Turning implied requirements into explicit requirements means that development, security, and business stakeholders can all determine which security risks are worth addressing and which ones can be accepted. If you’ve ever taken part in a penetration test before deploying to production, you know that arguing about the risk of findings and whether they’re worth fixing under the pressure of release deadlines can be a stressful experience. Articulating security requirements outside of the context of a release deadline means you can decide which risks are worth fixing without having to worry about focusing on meeting your deadline.

About Security Compass
Security Compass, a leading provider of cybersecurity solutions, enables organizations to shift left and build secure applications by design, integrated directly with existing DevSecOps tools and workflows. Its flagship product, SD Elements, allows organizations to balance the need to accelerate software time-to-market while managing risk by automating significant portions of proactive manual processes for security and compliance. SD Elements is the world’s first Balanced Development Automation platform. Security Compass is the trusted solution provider to leading financial and technology organizations, the U.S. Department of Defense, government agencies, and renowned global brands across multiple industries. The company is headquartered in Toronto, with offices in the U.S. and India. For more information, please visit https://www.securitycompass.com/